Large repositories need continuous semantic maintenance. A practical inconsistency resolver would treat a Git monorepo as a versioned knowledge base, use deterministic checks where possible, spend bounded agentic and formal-reasoning budget on high-value candidate artifact groups, and open reviewable pull requests that repair drift across code, tests, documentation, schemas, configuration, and mirrored external systems.
This is a work-in-progress side-project setup for me, at most 4 worker hosts, 1 public box, and 1 monorepo. The aim is to maximize AI subscription usage and hardware usage while minimizing my oversight.
I finally set aside some time to experiment with agent orchestrators. It turns out that building one tuned to your workflow is straightforward. The agent drafts its own orchestration skill, you run it, flag what falls short, and it iterates. The result fits your repositories, build system, and other constraints including budget. You may start from scratch or fork an existing orchestrator.
I've used coding agents extensively at work, but until recently I hadn't tried building anything usable from scratch with them outside work. Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3-Codex have both been impressive, so I thought I'd see how they perform on greenfield projects. At work, code reviews are mandatory. Personal experiments have leaner quality standards.
This post covers the deployment setup and three vibe-coded apps:
Rapid prototyping is effective for requirements discovery and alignment, allowing stakeholders with complementary expertise to explore how an aspect of a new product or an improvement to an existing one works in practice. Prototypes can also serve as partial reference implementations, encoding a meaningful subset of requirements in an unambiguous way.